Suppressing the Level of Corruption in Kampar District: A Study of The Impact of Accountability, Audit Opinions, Publication of Financial Statements, Audit Results And Follow-Up Of Audit Results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10538909Keywords:
Accountability, Audit Opinion, Financial Statement Disclosure, Audit Findings, Follow-up on Audit Results, Suppressing the Level of CorruptionAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effects of accountability, audit opinion, financial statement disclosure, audit findings, and follow-up on audit results in reducing corruption levels within the Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) of Kampar Regency. Conducted through a survey method, the study utilized a purposive sample of 50 accounting and finance professionals to achieve its objectives. Consistent with the research objectives, this study adheres to a conventional academic structure, utilizing clear and objective language, precise technical terminology, and a logical progression of ideas presented in a balanced manner. Primary data was collected via questionnaire distribution. Multiple linear regression tests were utilized to analyze the data. Results indicate that accountability, audit opinion, financial statement disclosure, audit findings, and follow-up of audit results significantly suppress the level of corruption in the Kampar district. It is imperative to follow up on audits to maintain transparency and accountability in the district. Based on simultaneous testing, the evidence suggests that factors such as accountability, audit opinion, disclosure of financial statements, audit findings, and follow-up on audit results play a role in reducing the incidence of corruption in Kampar district, in 2023.
Downloads
References
Abror, S., & Haryanto. (2014). Audit Pemerintah Dan Pengendalian Korupsi: Bukti Dari Data Panel Provinsi Di Indonesia. Journal of Accounting, 3(4), 1–11.
Aier, J. K., Jones, K. L., Lian, Q., & Schroeder, J. H. (2023). An Examination of the Terminal Year in an Auditor-Client Relationship. Accounting Horizons, XX(Xx), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2020-158
Apriastanti, S. D., Diah Widajantie, T., & Akuntansi, J. (2022). Pengaruh Temuan Audit Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 13(2), 728–737. https://riset.ti.or.id/
Arsana, I. P. J. (2016). Manajemen pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Deepublish.
Bastian, I. (2014). Audit Sektor Publik: Pemeriksaan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah.
Budiman, M. A., & Amyar, F. (2021). The effect of audit opinions, implementation of audit recommendations, and findings of state losses on corruption levels in the ministries and institutions of the Republic of Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 7(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v7i1.471
Djamil, N. (2023). Pelanggaran Prinsip Etika Audit dalam Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: Violation of Audit Ethics Principles in Dysfunctional Audit Behavior. JAAMTER : Jurnal Audit Akuntansi Manajemen Terintegrasi, 1(3), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8394964
Djamil, N. (2023). APIP dalam Pelaksanaan Maturitas SPIP: Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in Implementing the Maturity of the Government Internal Control System. JAAMTER : Jurnal Audit Akuntansi Manajemen Terintegrasi, 1(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8385072
Ekonomika, F., Bisnis, D. A. N., & Diponegoro, U. (2012). PENGARUH AKUNTABILITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH ( LKPD ) PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI INDONESIA.
Elkagiani, V. W., & Wibowo, P. (2021). Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Dan Indeks Persepsi Korupsi : A Preliminary Study. Jurnalku, 1(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v1i3.31
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25.
Graph TPK Berdasarkan Instansi. (2022). https://Www.Kpk.Go.Id/
Heriningsih, S. (2014). Kajian Empiris Tingkat Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Daerah dan Kinerja Penyelengara Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pada Kabupaten dan Kota di Indonesia. Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik Dan Kebijakan, 18(2), 29–40. Hery, S. E. (2015). Praktis Menyusun Laporan Keuangan; Cepat & Mahir Menyajikan. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-instansi
Jahja, H. J. S., & SH, M. H. (2012). Say no to korupsi. VisiMedia.
Jehandu, V., Salle, A., & Allo Layuk, P. K. (2020). Pengaruh Opini Audit Dan Temuan Audit Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Pemerintah Provinsi Papua. KEUDA (Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Daerah), 4(3), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.52062/keuda.v4i3.1097
Khasanah, N. L., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik, Kompleksitas, Dan Temuan Audit Terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 864–874. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article /view/6153
Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.01.002
Manzhur, I., & bin Mukarram, J. M. (n.d.). 1338 H. Lisân Al-Arab.
Mediaswati, R. (2013). Standar akuntansi pemerintahan dalam mewujudkan akuntabilitas dan transparansi pengelolaan keuangan daerah. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 17 (1). 32T32T https://Doi. Org/10.22146/Jkap, 684732, 29–45
Mohammadi, Z., Eini, M., Rastegari, A., & Tehrani, M. R. (2021). Chitosan as a machine for biomolecule delivery: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 256, 117414.
Mutia, A. (2022). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Naik 1 Poin Jadi 38 pada 2021.Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/01/26/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-naik-1-poin-jadi-38-pada-2021
Pertiwi, A. R. (2022). Pengaruh Opini Audit , Temuan Audit , Dan Kerugian Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Jawa Tengah. 11(2021), 1–8.
Priyatno, D. (2014). SPSS 22 Pengolah data terpraktis. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.
Putri, R. I. I., Araiku, J., & Sari, N. (2021). Statistik Deskriptif. Bening Media Publishing.
Quah, J. S. T. (2013). Minimizing Corruption in China: Is This an Impossible Dream? Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2013(4), 1. http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1217&context=mscas
Rahayuningtyas, D. P. A., & Setyaningrum, D. (2018). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Dan E-Government Terhadap Korupsi. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 1(4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2017.v1.i4.2597
Resulvi, S. A., Nurbaiti, A. S. E., & Wiwin, A. S. E. (2020). THE INFLUENCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY, AUDIT FINDING AND AUDIT RETRIFICATION ON THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION (Case study on West Java Province in 2017-2018). 7(2), 2659–2668.
Rini, R., & Damiati, L. (2017). Analisis Hasil Audit Pemerintahan dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintahan Provinsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 4(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v4i1.4933
Roussy, M. (2013). Internal auditors’ roles: From watchdogs to helpers and protectors of the top manager. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7–8), 550–571.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis: Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian, Edisi 6 Buku 1.
Shanti, Y. K., & Kusumawardhani, S. S. (2020). Pengaruh 3 Kecerdasan Auditor Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Dengan Pengalaman Sebagai Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Barelang, 4(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.33884/jab.v4i2.1945
Sugiyono, M. P. P. (2016). Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D (cetakan ke-23). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Transparency international. (2021). Ti.or.Id. https://ti.or.id/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nasrullah Djamil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
